Former ICICI Bank CEO Chanda Kochhar Accused Of Accepting ₹64 Crore Bribe, Participated In Quid Pro Quo Arrangement

Former ICICI Bank CEO Chanda Kochhar Accused Of Accepting ₹64 Crore Bribe, Participated In Quid Pro Quo Arrangement

In a July 3 order, an appellate tribunal ruled that former ICICI Bank CEO Chanda Kochhar received a bribe of Rs 64 crore. She is accused of participating in a "quid pro quo" arrangement." Quid pro quo" signifies an exchange where one benefit is given in return for another.

Tresha DiasUpdated: Tuesday, July 22, 2025, 11:57 AM IST
article-image
File Image |

Former ICICI Bank CEO Chanda Kochhar has been accused of accepting a Rs 64 crore bribe. This is in connection with the sanctioning of a Rs 300 crore loan to the Videocon Group, according to The Times of India.

In a July 3 order, an appellate tribunal ruled that former ICICI Bank CEO Chanda Kochhar received a bribe of Rs 64 crore. She partook in a "quid pro quo" arrangement. It involved her husband Deepak Kochhar and a company linked to the Videocon Group.

"Quid pro quo" is a Latin phrase meaning "something for something" or "this for that". It signifies an exchange where one benefit is given in return for another.

The tribunal stated Kochhar failed to disclose a clear conflict of interest while sanctioning a Rs 300 crore loan to Videocon. The payment was routed from Videocon's SEPL to NuPower Renewables Pvt Ltd, controlled by Deepak Kochhar, just a day after ICICI Bank disbursed the loan. The tribunal backed the Enforcement Directorate's case.

NRPL, officially owned by Videocon Chairman Venugopal Dhoot, was under Deepak Kochhar, who also served as its managing director, according to the tribunal.

It further stated there was clear evidence of quid pro quo; the money trail provided the evidence. The money trail was supported by statements under Section 50 of the PMLA Act.

The November 2020 decision by the adjudicating authority to release Rs 78 crore worth of assets was criticised by the tribunal. The assets belonged to Kochhar and her associates. The tribunal stated the order overlooked key evidence and that it was a flawed order.

Concluding that the loan, its timing, and the subsequent fund transfers demonstrated a misuse of authority and violation of ICICI Bank’s internal policies, the tribunal upheld the ED’s attachment of assets as justified and supported by strong documentary proof.

RECENT STORIES

SBI Aims To Increase Women Workforce To 30% In Five Years, Launches Initiatives For Leadership...

SBI Aims To Increase Women Workforce To 30% In Five Years, Launches Initiatives For Leadership...

PM Kisan Yojana: Government Releases ₹42,000 Crore For Farmers, But When Will The 21st Installment...

PM Kisan Yojana: Government Releases ₹42,000 Crore For Farmers, But When Will The 21st Installment...

IPO Rush On Dalal Street Next Week, Tata Capital & LG Electronics To Lead A Busy Listing Calendar

IPO Rush On Dalal Street Next Week, Tata Capital & LG Electronics To Lead A Busy Listing Calendar

Market Rally Lifts Eight Of Top-10 Valued Firms By ₹1.94 Lakh Crore; TCS, Reliance, HDFC Bank...

Market Rally Lifts Eight Of Top-10 Valued Firms By ₹1.94 Lakh Crore; TCS, Reliance, HDFC Bank...

Markets Brace For A Volatile Week, US-China Tariff Tensions & Key Inflation Data To Set The Tone

Markets Brace For A Volatile Week, US-China Tariff Tensions & Key Inflation Data To Set The Tone