Threat Calls To Nitin Gadkari: NIA Finds No Evidence; Mumbai Court Returns Report Over Jurisdiction Dispute

Threat Calls To Nitin Gadkari: NIA Finds No Evidence; Mumbai Court Returns Report Over Jurisdiction Dispute

The special court, Mumbai, returns the closure report to NIA over the jurisdiction issue.

Charul Shah JoshiUpdated: Saturday, August 31, 2024, 02:47 AM IST
article-image
Union minister Nitin Gadkari | PTI

The National Investigating Agency (NIA), which recently took over the case of extortion calls made to Union Minister Nitin Gadkari, found no evidence in the case and wants to close the case. The special court, Mumbai, however, returned the report to the NIA over the jurisdiction issue.

As per the case registered by the NIA, on March 21, 2023, a caller who identified himself as Jayesh Pujari, had called the public relations office of Gadkari at around 10:55 am, demanding Rs10 crore. Pujari had threatened to kill the minister in a bomb blast if his demands were not fulfilled. Further, on January 14, 2023, the same man called had demanded Rs100 crore.

The case was initially registered with Nagpur police who during the investigation concluded that both the calls were made by Pujari, who was serving a life sentence in Hindalaga jail, Belagavi, Karnataka since 2013 for murder. The police hence had invoked the charges of UAPA to the case.

As the provisions of UAPA were invoked in the case, the case was taken up by NIA on July 13, 2023. While NIA was probing the case, the Nagpur police submitted a chargesheet against the Pujari and his associate Afsar Pasha. The NIA had sought to transfer the case from the Nagpur court to the Mumbai court. But the plea was rejected by the special court in Nagpur.

NIA, however, after probing the case for over a year, submitted a closure report for want of evidence before the special court in Mumbai.

The special judge AK Lahoti observed, “The record shows that state agency proceeded with probe and filed chargesheet before the special court in Nagpur. Hence closure report should have been filed before the special court, Nagpur, where the proceedings are subjudice.”

The court further said that there cannot be two simultaneous proceedings against the accused in two different courts for the same crime number on the same facts.

The court has now ordered to return the closure report to NIA, for it to file it before the appropriate court.

RECENT STORIES

'My Home-My Right': Maharashtra Unveils ₹70,000 Crore Housing Policy 2025 To Build 35 Lakh...

'My Home-My Right': Maharashtra Unveils ₹70,000 Crore Housing Policy 2025 To Build 35 Lakh...

Western Railway To Undertake 2-Hour Blocks Between Atul–Valsad And Navsari On May 26 & 27;...

Western Railway To Undertake 2-Hour Blocks Between Atul–Valsad And Navsari On May 26 & 27;...

Mumbai: Two Major Cyber Fraud Rackets Busted; ₹8.24 Crore Duped Through Investment Scams

Mumbai: Two Major Cyber Fraud Rackets Busted; ₹8.24 Crore Duped Through Investment Scams

Mumbai News: Green Garden CHS Chairman, Secretary Disqualified For Failing To Hold AGM On Time In...

Mumbai News: Green Garden CHS Chairman, Secretary Disqualified For Failing To Hold AGM On Time In...

Rainbow Awards 2025: Entries Invited To Celebrate Queer Literature And Journalism

Rainbow Awards 2025: Entries Invited To Celebrate Queer Literature And Journalism