Bombay HC Accepts Lulu Malls' Assurance To Obtain License From Phonographic Performance Limited For Playing Music

Bombay HC Accepts Lulu Malls' Assurance To Obtain License From Phonographic Performance Limited For Playing Music

The Bombay High Court has accepted an assurance from Lulu International Shopping Malls Pvt. Ltd. that it will obtain a license from Phonographic Performance Limited (PPL) before using copyrighted sound recordings at events held on its premises. Justice Riyaz Chagla accepted the company’s assurance.

Urvi MahajaniUpdated: Wednesday, December 11, 2024, 08:13 PM IST
article-image
Bombay High Court | PTI

Mumbai: The Bombay High Court has accepted an assurance from Lulu International Shopping Malls Pvt. Ltd. that it will obtain a license from Phonographic Performance Limited (PPL) before using copyrighted sound recordings at events held on its premises. Justice Riyaz Chagla accepted the company’s assurance.

PPL had filed a commercial suit against Lulu International Shopping Malls, alleging unauthorized use of its copyrighted songs at events since 2022 without paying the requisite license fees. PPL’s counsel Sharan Jagtiani sought a restraining order against the mall and its associated properties for copyright infringement.

In its defense, the mall assured the court that it would secure a license from PPL before communicating any sound recordings to the public during its events, except those expressly exempted under Section 52 of the Copyright Act. Additionally, the mall committed to ensuring that third-party organisers of events at its premises obtain the necessary licenses from PPL before playing copyrighted songs.

Justice Chagla, in an order on December 5, said: “The learned counsel appearing for Defendant No.1 states on instructions that without prejudice to Defendant No.1’s rights and contentions in the suit, Defendant No.1 shall, in respect of events of any kind (other than those expressly exempted under Section 52 of the Copyright Act) organized by it at its premises, obtain a license from the Plaintiff at the tariff published on the Plaintiff’s website.”

The order further clarified that for third-party events, “the Defendant No.1 shall permit the sound recordings, for which the Plaintiff claims copyright, to be communicated to the public only after such third party obtains a license.”

The license fees paid by the mall, if any, will be subject to the final outcome of the suit. The court accepted the statements as undertakings and disposed of PPL’s interim application, with the mall required to adhere to its commitments.

RECENT STORIES

Mumbai News: Parents Allege Police Collusion, Evidence Suppression In School Sexual Assault Case

Mumbai News: Parents Allege Police Collusion, Evidence Suppression In School Sexual Assault Case

Mumbai News: Colaba Residents Move HC To Halt Gateway Of India Jetty Project, Cite Heritage Concerns

Mumbai News: Colaba Residents Move HC To Halt Gateway Of India Jetty Project, Cite Heritage Concerns

₹15L Trading Scam: Cyber Police Arrest Trio Including BTech Student

₹15L Trading Scam: Cyber Police Arrest Trio Including BTech Student

Major Fire Engulfs ED's Mumbai Office In Heritage Building; No Case Files Lost

Major Fire Engulfs ED's Mumbai Office In Heritage Building; No Case Files Lost

Pan-India ₹30-40 Crore Scam: 5 Arrested For Duping Victims Via Fake Work-From-Home Ruse

Pan-India ₹30-40 Crore Scam: 5 Arrested For Duping Victims Via Fake Work-From-Home Ruse