2008 Malegaon Blast Verdict Today: Who Are The 7 Key Accused And What Charges Are They Facing?

2008 Malegaon Blast Verdict Today: Who Are The 7 Key Accused And What Charges Are They Facing?

The 2008 Malegaon blast case verdict is anticipated today from a special NIA court in Mumbai, involving seven key accused, including former BJP MP Pragya Singh Thakur and Lt Col Prasad Purohit, facing UAPA and IPC charges.

Manasi KambleUpdated: Thursday, July 31, 2025, 10:10 AM IST
article-image
2008 Malegaon Blast Verdict Today: Who Are The 7 Key Accused And What Charges Are They Facing? | FPJ

Mumbai: The 2008 Malegaon blast case verdict is expected to be delivered today by a special National Investigation Agency (NIA) court in Mumbai. The case involves seven key accused individuals, including former BJP MP Pragya Singh Thakur and Lt Col Prasad Purohit, who are facing charges under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) and the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

Who Are The Main Accused And Allegations On Them?

The accused in the blast case include Pragya Singh Thakur, a former BJP MP, who allegedly provided the bomb's motorcycle, and Lt Col Prasad Purohit, accused of supplying explosives and planning the attack. Major (Retd) Ramesh Upadhyay is linked to the right-wing group Abhinav Bharat, accused of participating in planning meetings. Ajay Rahirkar, the group's treasurer, is accused of financing the conspiracy. Sudhakar Dwivedi (Dayanand Pandey), a self-styled religious leader, allegedly provided ideological support. Sudhakar Chaturvedi is accused of storing explosives, and Sameer Kulkarni participated in planning meetings. They face charges under UAPA and various IPC sections, including conspiracy and murder.

Charges On The 7 Key Accused

The 7 main accused of 2008 Malegaon blasts are facing charges under UAPA sections 16 and 18: Committing and conspiring to commit terrorist acts and IPC sections 120(b): Criminal conspiracy; 302: Murder; 307: Attempt to murder; 324: Voluntarily causing hurt; 153(a): Promoting enmity between two religious groups.

The NIA has sought "commensurate punishment" for the accused, arguing that the blast was orchestrated to terrorize a section of the Muslim community, disrupt essential services, and create communal tensions. The agency presented 323 witnesses during the trial, of whom 37 turned hostile. The case has been ongoing for nearly 17 years, with the trial beginning in 2018 and concluding in April 2025.

RECENT STORIES

2008 Malegaon Blast Verdict: Mumbai Special NIA Court Turns Into Fortress Amid Heavy Security...

2008 Malegaon Blast Verdict: Mumbai Special NIA Court Turns Into Fortress Amid Heavy Security...

‘Save Savarkar Sadan, Denotify Jinnah House As Heritage Structure’: Petitioner Urges Bombay HC

‘Save Savarkar Sadan, Denotify Jinnah House As Heritage Structure’: Petitioner Urges Bombay HC

2008 Malegaon Blast Verdict: Special NIA Court Flags Evidence Tampering, Recommends Action Against...

2008 Malegaon Blast Verdict: Special NIA Court Flags Evidence Tampering, Recommends Action Against...

2008 Malegaon Blast Verdict: Court Finds No Direct Evidence Linking Key Accused To Conspiracy Or...

2008 Malegaon Blast Verdict: Court Finds No Direct Evidence Linking Key Accused To Conspiracy Or...

2008 Malegaon Blast Verdict: NIA Discredits ATS Evidence, Highlights Legal Gaps In Original Probe

2008 Malegaon Blast Verdict: NIA Discredits ATS Evidence, Highlights Legal Gaps In Original Probe