The Supreme Court's latest directive to clear stray dogs from the streets of Delhi has ignited a wave of emotional responses nationwide. In reaction, The Free Press Journal held an X poll soliciting followers: “#SupremeCourt Ruling On Taking #Dogs Off Delhi Streets: Is It Necessary To Overturn The Decision?”
A significant 88% of participants responded with ‘Yes’, describing the order as “inhumane” and “unjust.” Numerous social media users contended that the choice undermined the Court’s function as a defender of rights, rather than an enabler of cruelty.
"Choice isn't beneficial for creatures." "It ought to be called off," one user stated plainly. Another person expressed sorrow, "I didn't anticipate such a verdict from the Supreme Court, it's quite inhumane."
Some condemned the directive as undemocratic, highlighting the absence of public input. "Delivering a verdict without allowing a chance to be heard is a criminal act." “One commenter claimed that justices should be eliminated.” Others claimed the verdict undermined trust in the judiciary.
Numerous internet users emphasized that attention should be directed toward actual crime rather than innocent creatures. "Sexual assailants?" Abductors? Dishonest authorities? They wander freely. "However, birds and dogs—simple targets, isn’t it?” commented another online user.
Animal enthusiasts came together under hashtags such as #SaveDelhiDogs2025 and #SaveDelhiNCRDogs, calling on officials to prioritise sterilisation, vaccination, and feeding initiatives instead of large-scale removals. "Animals possess rights similar to other forms of life." “Instead of condemning them to die for no reason, offer them food, medicine, and vaccinations,” a user commented.
“This isn’t solely about dogs; it’s about our identity as a society,” another person remarked, claiming the administration is “targeting those unable to advocate for their own rights.”
An online user's expression captured the feeling perfectly: “Absolutely yes yes yes yes yes yes 1 crore times yes!” We must rescue our furry companions by any means necessary.
The message from people is clear, the majority of people are becoming the voice of the voiceless dogs who are forced to be excavated from the corners of the street they call home in a pound where there is no garaunttee of their safety, food or shelter. But the question stays, will the apex court listen the cries of people voicing?
