'Makes Statements Without Any Facts': Shiv Sena Leader Shaina NC Attacks MP Sanjay Raut Over Statement On MS Golwarkar

Mumbai: Shiv Sena leader Shaina NC launched a scathing attack on Shiv Sena MP Sanjay Raut and said that he has lost his mental balance and every morning makes statements without studying any facts.

Sanjay Raut had advised Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Saturday to watch the movie Chhava based on Sambhaji Maharaj and clarify if what RSS leader MSS Golvarkar had said about Sambhaji Maharaj was wrong.

Shaina NC stated that Sanjay Raut wakes up every morning and when he does not have anything to speak then he makes a controversial statements. She added that there is no division in India and no one can break the country.

"Sanjay Raut has lost his mental balance because every morning he makes statements without any facts. We give credit to the Prime Minister, Home Minister and all the leaders of NDA for the pace at which India is moving towards progress... When you (Sanjay Raut) wake up in the morning and you do not have any issue, then you make controversial remarks. There is no division in India... No one can break us ...", Shaina NC said to ANI on Sunday.

While speaking to the reporters on Saturday, Sanjay Raut had stated that no one can tell what is the mindset of PM Modi. He stated that in previous times, PM Modi has promoted films such as Tashkent Files, Kashmir Files, Chhava or The Accidental Prime Minister and if MS Golwalkar presented his views on Sambhaji Maharaj then it is PM Modi's responsibility to watch the movie and claim that Golwalkar was wrong.

Raut reacted to Assaduddin Owaisi's statement when he claimed that late RSS leader MS Golwalkar used the worst words in his book Bunch of Thoughts and Hindutva for Sambhaji Maharaj.

"The worst words for Sambhaji Maharaj were used by late RSS leader MS Golwalkar in his book Bunch of Thoughts and Hindutva ideologue Veer Savarkar also used the worst words for Sambhaji Maharaj", Owaisi said on Saturday.

Disclaimer: This is a syndicated feed. The article is not edited by the FPJ editorial team.