Baba Ramdev Assures Delhi HC Of Removal Of Videos & Posts Containing Controversial 'Sharbat Jihad' Remark
The controversy arose after Ramdev, in a video, allegedly accused Hamdard of using its profits to fund the construction of mosques and madrasas, referring to the drink as part of a so-called "sharbat jihad."

Baba Ramdev Assures Delhi HC Of Removal Of Videos & Posts Containing Controversial 'Sharbat Jihad' Remark | Photo: Twitter Image
New Delhi: Yoga Guru, Baba Ramdev, on Monday assured the Delhi High Court that all videos and social media posts containing his controversial "Sharbat Jihad" remark will be taken down.
The assurance comes in response to a legal suit filed by Hamdard, the makers of the popular drink Rooh Afza, who objected to Ramdev's statements.
About The Controversy
The controversy arose after Ramdev, in a video, allegedly accused Hamdard of using its profits to fund the construction of mosques and madrasas, referring to the drink as part of a so-called "sharbat jihad."
These remarks were widely criticised for their communal undertones and were deemed by Hamdard as an attempt to create a "communal divide" while disparaging their product.
During the hearing, Justice Amit Bansal of the Delhi High Court expressed strong disapproval of the remarks and said, "When I saw this ad, I could not believe my ears and eyes."
Senior Advocate Rajiv Nayar, representing Patanjali and Baba Ramdev, informed the court that the controversial videos would be removed.
ALSO READ
The court, however, directed Ramdev to submit an affidavit affirming that he would refrain from making such statements in the future. Remarking on the matter, the court stated, "He can keep these thoughts in his mind but should not express them," as it scheduled the next hearing for May 1.
The case highlights the growing concerns over the use of communal rhetoric in public discourse and its potential to harm social harmony.
On April 3, Baba Ramdev stirred controversy while promoting his company's product, Gulaab Sharbat.
ALSO READ
In a video, he allegedly criticised Hamdard's Rooh Afza, alleging that the company was diverting its funds toward the construction of mosques and madrasas. Ramdev further referred to the drink as part of a "sharbat jihad."
Senior advocates Mukul Rohatgi and Sandeep Sethi represented Hamdard as plaintiffs in the case.
(Except for the headline, this article has not been edited by FPJ's editorial team and is auto-generated from an agency feed.)
RECENT STORIES
-
May Hiring Slows To 1,30,000 Jobs As Donald Trump’s Tariffs, Immigration Crackdown Strain US Job... -
MP Shocker! 17-Year-Old Stabbed To Death Merely 500 Metres Away From Police Station In Ratlam -
Bakri Eid 2025: Thane Police Issues Traffic Advisory For Kalyan; Alternate Routes Announced For June... -
Central Bank To Raise Loan-To-Value Ratio For Gold Loans To Small Borrowers Of Upto ₹2.5 Lakh To... -
Mumbai Police Register Three FIRs Against Horse Drawn Carriages In One Month With PETA India And...